Re: pg_trigger.tgparentid

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_trigger.tgparentid
Date: 2020-02-27 16:32:21
Message-ID: 23764.1582821141@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Thanks both -- pushed. I also changed regress/sql/triggers to leave
> tables around that have a non-zero tgparentid. This ensures that the
> pg_upgrade test sees such objects, as well as findoidjoins.

> I refrained from doing the findoidjoins dance itself, though; I got a
> large number of false positives that I think are caused by some pg12-era
> hacking.

Generally I try to update findoidjoins once per release cycle, after
feature freeze. I don't think it's worth messing with it more often
than that. But thanks for making sure there'll be data for it to find.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-02-27 16:51:58 BEFORE ROW triggers for partitioned tables
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2020-02-27 16:30:17 Re: Error on failed COMMIT