Re: pg_class(relpersistence) of hash index

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_class(relpersistence) of hash index
Date: 2014-11-24 15:48:00
Message-ID: 23707.1416844080@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> While checking how BM_PERMANENT flag is set (in buffer header), I noticed that
> hash index has it set too. Shouldn't pg_class(relpersistence) be 'u' in this
> case?

See archives; we do not currently have a way to support unlogged indexes
on logged tables. The whole hash-index mess would be better if we did,
but getting there is less than trivial.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Shulgin 2014-11-24 16:05:39 Re: Replication connection URI?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-11-24 15:46:23 Re: no test programs in contrib