Re: psql table comments?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql table comments?
Date: 2004-08-18 17:39:34
Message-ID: 2370.1092850774@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I have just noticed that \d+ tablename doesn't show the table
> comment/description - should it? Is this a TODO?

\dt+ tablename shows this, in what is probably a more convenient format
than \d+ would be able to use. The \d printout is already awfully
cluttered, I don't think we want to add stuff to it unnecessarily.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2004-08-18 17:41:41 gcc: unrecognized option `-pthreads'
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-18 17:27:10 Re: 8.0 libpq: missing get_home_path()