| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Call for BOFs Linux World Expo Boston |
| Date: | 2004-10-07 20:46:35 |
| Message-ID: | 23649.1097181995@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> Is there some way to mark this kind of stuff on the TODO
> list? Right now things are marked, essentially, "might get done
> eventually," and "handled in the coming release." Maybe some marker
> like "slated for version m.n" would be good. :)
If we actually had such a schedule and people paid to meet it, such
markings might mean something. The truth of the matter is that the
TODO list is just a collection of things that some people think might
be good things to work on eventually. Reading more into it than that
is a mistake, because there is no schedule.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-07 20:55:39 | Re: [HACKERS] Call for BOFs Linux World Expo Boston |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-10-07 20:21:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Call for BOFs Linux World Expo Boston |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-07 20:55:39 | Re: [HACKERS] Call for BOFs Linux World Expo Boston |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-07 20:43:53 | Re: DDL triggers [was Re: database constraints] |