Re: [PATCH] Completed unaccent dictionary with many missing characters

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Przemysław Sztoch <przemyslaw(at)sztoch(dot)pl>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Completed unaccent dictionary with many missing characters
Date: 2022-05-04 15:32:37
Message-ID: 2360517.1651678357@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On 28.04.22 18:50, Przemysław Sztoch wrote:
>> Current unnaccent dictionary does not include many popular numeric symbols,
>> in example: "m²" -> "m2"

> Seems reasonable.

It kinda feels like this is outside the charter of an "unaccent"
dictionary. I don't object to having these conversions available
but it seems like it ought to be a separate feature.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2022-05-04 15:32:51 JSON Functions and Operators Docs for v15
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-05-04 15:30:12 Re: configure openldap crash warning