Re: Change in "policy" on dump ordering?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jordan Gigov <coladict(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Change in "policy" on dump ordering?
Date: 2017-08-03 21:37:41
Message-ID: 23585.1501796261@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de> writes:
> Am Donnerstag, den 27.07.2017, 15:52 -0400 schrieb Tom Lane:
>> So I'm thinking we should consider the multi-pass patch I posted as
>> a short-term, backpatchable workaround, which we could hope to
>> replace with dependency logic later.

> +1, it would be really nice if this could be fixed in the back-branches
> before v11.

Done.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-08-03 21:43:44 Re: Hash Functions
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-08-03 21:32:35 Re: Hash Functions