Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0
Date: 2015-05-08 21:51:27
Message-ID: 23549.1431121887@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> prairiedog, without CCA, failed as well
> http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=prairiedog&dt=2015-05-08%2019%3A55%3A11
> different test, but again directly after index creation. So I hope it's
> indeed the indcheckxmin thing.

Oh, interesting. That definitely suggests it's about machine speed/timing
not CCA per se (prairiedog being quite slow). Which would fit with the
indcheckxmin theory.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Wei Shan 2015-05-10 09:32:32 Re: Schema Consolidation in PostgreSQL
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-05-08 21:13:39 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2015-05-08 21:59:44 Re: Postgres GSSAPI Encryption
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-05-08 21:48:25 Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs (Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API)