Denis Chavez <dnchavez(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> ... My advice: when selecting for update inside a rule, we must
> especify the table twice?, that is: SELECT * FROM tablename WHERE ... FOR
> UPDATE OF tablename; :-)
Hmm. Seems that the problem is this: the unadorned FOR UPDATE tries
to apply FOR UPDATE to OLD and NEW as well as the regular tables
mentioned in your SELECT. FOR UPDATE of NEW doesn't work ... and
is fairly nonsensical anyway ...
regards, tom lane