Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)debian(dot)org>, jd <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
Date: 2011-02-17 04:34:35
Message-ID: 23478.1297917275@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>> In particular, getting rid of use of OpenSSL would not be sufficient
>> to satisfy the most rabid GPL partisans that we were in compliance.

> I've never heard anyone argue that position, don't believe anyone would,
> and certainly don't agree with it.

[ shrug ... ] Check the Postgres archives, from back around 2000 if
memory serves.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2011-02-17 04:38:33 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Hot Standby feedback for avoidance of cleanup conflicts on stand
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2011-02-17 04:23:33 Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage