| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Hot Standby (v9d) |
| Date: | 2009-01-28 21:12:28 |
| Message-ID: | 23375.1233177148@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I vote with Simon. The thing is that if you get some queries
> cancelled, you'll realize you have a problem.
... or if you don't, they couldn't have been all that critical.
> Having your failover be 12 hours
> behind (or 12 months behind) is something that it would be much easier
> to not realize.
Okay, I'm sold, positive max_standby_delay should be the default.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2009-01-28 21:22:52 | Re: 8.4 release planning |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2009-01-28 21:11:43 | Re: Hot Standby (v9d) |