Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Nested Transaction TODO list

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Nested Transaction TODO list
Date: 2004-07-03 21:40:23
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> Why does START have a different Node from BEGIN anyway?  This seems to
> be a leftover from when people thought they should behave differently.
> They are the same now, so there's no point in distinguishing them, or is it?

[shrug...] I'd counsel leaving this as-is.  We've practically always
regretted it when we made the parser discard information about what
the user typed.  For instance, I was just reminded yesterday that we
really ought to distinguish SortClauses created due to user ORDER BY
clauses from those created because the parser silently added 'em.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Haroldo StengerDate: 2004-07-03 23:05:09
Subject: Re: Nested Transaction TODO list
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2004-07-03 21:22:40
Subject: Re: Nested Transaction TODO list

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group