| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Include Lists for Text Search |
| Date: | 2008-03-10 14:17:31 |
| Message-ID: | 23353.1205158651@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> writes:
> On Sun, 9 Mar 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Would a similar parameter be useful for any of the other dictionary
>> types?
> There are many things desirable to do with dictionaries, for example,
> say dictionary to return an original word plus it's normal form. Another
> feature is a not recognize-and-stop dictionaries, but allow
> filtering dictionary. We have a feeling that a little middleware would help
> implement this, and CaseSensitive too.
Hmm, I can see how some middleware would help with folding or not
folding the input token, but what about the words coming from the
dictionary file (particularly the *output* lexeme)? It's not apparent
to me that it's sensible to try to control that from outside the
dictionary.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-03-10 14:24:59 | Re: Include Lists for Text Search |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-03-10 14:05:22 | Re: Include Lists for Text Search |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-03-10 14:24:59 | Re: Include Lists for Text Search |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-03-10 14:05:22 | Re: Include Lists for Text Search |