Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response
Date: 1999-12-01 05:17:51
Message-ID: 23289.944025471@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>>>> Is this an item for the TODO list?
>>
>> Fixed in current sources, I believe.

> The problem (I sent it in) was actually no sub-selects in target list.

Still fixed in current sources ;-) ...

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message sk.list 1999-12-01 08:53:21 Re: [ADMIN] When postgres will be faster?
Previous Message svn 1999-12-01 04:11:18 Grabbing Data from serial port into postgres