Re: Sorting Improvements for 8.4

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Sorting Improvements for 8.4
Date: 2007-12-19 15:54:07
Message-ID: 23285.1198079647@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no> writes:
> And remember; Users don't care about portability-issues, they care about
> performance.

Nonsense. If Postgres stops working on their machine, they'll care.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-12-19 16:15:37 Re: Testing mail list
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-12-19 15:52:26 Re: pgwin32_open returning EINVAL