Re: First SVG graphic

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Jürgen Purtz <juergen(at)purtz(dot)de>
Subject: Re: First SVG graphic
Date: 2019-03-14 13:10:42
Message-ID: 23265.1552569042@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2019-03-11 15:50, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Ideally, we'd treat them much as we do for bison output files:
>> we'll supply them in tarballs but you'd better have the relevant
>> tools if you want to build docs from a git pull. However, that
>> may be assuming too much about the portability of the tools ...

> The portability is not something I'm concerned about, but Ditaa requires
> Java, so that might annoy some people.

Portability is something you *should* be concerned about. We want
all patch submitters to be able to build the docs, else we'll forever
be fighting silly markup errors. That's not a productive use of
anybody's time.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Doc comments form 2019-03-14 15:29:04 28.4.1. VACUUM Progress Reporting
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-03-14 12:40:38 Re: First SVG graphic