| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows |
| Date: | 2012-09-03 16:58:48 |
| Message-ID: | 2324.1346691528@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> The attached very small patch allows pg_upgrade's "make check" to
> succeed on REL9_2_STABLE on my Mingw system.
> However, I consider the issue I mentioned earlier regarding use of
> forward slashes in the argument to rmdir to be a significant blocker, so
> I'm going to go and fix that and then pull this all together.
My intentions over the next hour or two are to commit the
unix-socket-directory fix and then sync 9.2 pg_upgrade with HEAD
(ie, back-patch everything that's in HEAD except the int64-XLogRecPtr
changes). Will that cause any problems for what you're doing?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-09-03 17:07:11 | Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-09-03 16:57:52 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2. |