Re: STILL LACKING: CVS tag for release 7.2.1

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jack(at)floatingdoghead(dot)net
Cc: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Jack Bates <pgsql(at)floatingdoghead(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: STILL LACKING: CVS tag for release 7.2.1
Date: 2002-05-07 14:04:49
Message-ID: 23210.1020780289@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

<jack(at)floatingdoghead(dot)net> writes:
> Aside from being a near-universal "best practice", it makes it easier for
> someone to analyze whether local patches to 7.2.1 conflict with work that
> the team has committed.

There is a 7.2 branch, and I would think that the tip of that branch is
generally what you are interested in if you do not want the HEAD tip.

Applying a tag to indicate exactly what state of that branch got
released as 7.2.1 would be good from a historical-documentation
point of view, but I can't see that it has any direct relevance
for either current development or maintenance work.

Of course, the real answer to your question is that Marc Fournier does
that work, and the rest of us long ago gave up trying to get him to be
perfectly consistent in his tagging practices ;-)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

  • at 2002-05-22 13:04:03 from Shra

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-05-07 14:15:16 Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports
Previous Message mlw 2002-05-07 14:03:07 Re: OK, lets talk portability.