| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)partitur(dot)se> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl? |
| Date: | 2002-01-04 04:08:16 |
| Message-ID: | 23209.1010117296@www3.gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I am preparing the update of the FreeBSD port of PostgreSQL with the
> upcoming 7.2, and I'm just wondering: is there any performance penalty
> intoduced by including --with-ssl in the default configure args?
No, the only reason that the switch exists is that some hosts may not have
OpenSSL
installed (including related legal reasons).
--
GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
http://www.gmx.net
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| " | application/octet-stream | 0 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-01-04 04:25:23 | Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-04 04:03:11 | Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl? |