From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tim Allen <tim(at)proximity(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)hub(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] Peculiar behaviour in libpq |
Date: | 1999-06-24 15:00:28 |
Message-ID: | 23194.930236428@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Tim Allen <tim(at)proximity(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> I've noticed some strange behaviour when using libpq with
> PostgreSQL 6.4.2 on RedHat Linux 5.1. I'm using libpq asynchronously, with
> a select() loop, calling PQconsumeInput etc. What is happening is that
> occasionally, after I have received a callback via select() and processed
> the result, I get an extra callback. These extra callbacks have no result
> attached to them, PQisBusy() returns false, and, by the records I'm
> keeping in my own program, there is no database operation pending (ie I
> already have a result for every operation I've submitted).
Hmm. Could be that the terminating ReadyForQuery message ('Z') is
arriving in a separate packet from the last message of the query
response proper --- but that doesn't seem real probable. Other
possibilities are that backend NOTIFY or NOTICE messages are arriving;
but if you were using NOTIFY you'd know it, and NOTICEs ought to show
up on stderr (unless you've suppressed that).
If you really care, you could instrument the low-level guts of libpq
to see what is arriving when (the routines in fe-misc.c would be the
place to put debug logging).
> Will it go away in 6.5? On the whole it seems reasonably benign, I just
> worry there may be something bad going on that will bite me eventually.
Yeah, it seems worth understanding at least. I'm pretty sure 6.5 will
behave the same, since nothing much has changed in the BE/FE protocol.
I'd be interested to know what you find out, if you pursue it.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Phil Moors | 1999-06-24 15:05:41 | Re: [INTERFACES] ECPG fetch broken after upgrade to 6.5 |
Previous Message | Peter Mount | 1999-06-24 14:41:41 | RE: [INTERFACES] JDBC6.5-1.2 bug wrt timestamp |