| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Change draft gmake control |
| Date: | 2007-01-27 21:19:16 |
| Message-ID: | 23143.1169932756@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Well, if 'draft' was only for html, I could see suggesting just 'gmake
> draft', but 'draft' can be used for Postscript and PDF too.
But those aren't cases where saving some typing is useful (in fact,
I'd bet money that no one will ever use them). Draft runs with html
output are highly useful, and like Peter I think "make draft" ought
to work for that.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-27 22:47:01 | Re: Change draft gmake control |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-01-27 20:47:55 | Re: [pgsql-patches] Change draft gmake control |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-27 22:47:01 | Re: Change draft gmake control |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-27 21:17:11 | Re: Ctid chain following enhancement |