From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: History for 8.3.6 tag is a little strange |
Date: | 2010-09-24 19:06:42 |
Message-ID: | 23120.1285355202@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> Doing "git log tags/REL8_3_6" I see two commits after the one labeled
> "tag for 8.3.6".
> The other tags I checked all seem to match what I would expect. I'm not
> suggesting that anything be done, I just wanted to point this out in
> case something strange happened.
Hmmm ... the files those commits touch are indeed tagged REL8_3_6 at the
later commit in the CVS repository, and I pulled out the 8.3.6 tarball
and confirmed that that has the newer versions too.
[ pokes around in mail archives ... ]
What seems to have happened is that the analyze_requires_snapshot() bug
was reported on pgsql-packagers and we concluded that it was serious
enough to justify a re-wrap; but the tarballs hadn't gone anywhere
public so we just did the deed without bumping the version number.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-09-24 19:22:48 | Re: Serializable Snapshot Isolation |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-24 18:42:19 | Re: psql's \dn versus temp schemas |