Re: Binary in/out for aclitem

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Radosław Smogura <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Binary in/out for aclitem
Date: 2011-02-22 22:24:28
Message-ID: 23049.1298413468@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 02/22/2011 05:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think this one has got far less use-case than the other, and I don't
>> want to expose the internal representation of ACLITEM to the world.

> The sendv for enums sends the label, and ISTR there are some others that
> send the text representation also. Would that be better?

It'd be more future-proof than this patch, but I'm still unconvinced
about the use-case.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2011-02-22 22:32:18 Re: How to extract a value from a record using attnum or attname?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-02-22 22:13:17 Re: Binary in/out for aclitem