Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?

From: Giles Lean <giles(at)nemeton(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Date: 2002-10-24 02:54:50
Message-ID: 23040.1035428090@hpchs.cup.hp.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> OK, does pre-1.6 NetBSD have fgetpos/fsetpos that is off_t/quad?

Yes:

int
fgetpos(FILE *stream, fpos_t *pos);

int
fsetpos(FILE *stream, const fpos_t *pos);

Per comments in <stdio.h> fpos_t is the same format as off_t, and
off_t and fpos_t have been 64 bit since 1994.

http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/basesrc/include/stdio.h

Regards,

Giles

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-24 02:56:01 Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-24 02:37:49 Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?