Re: LIMIT NULL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LIMIT NULL
Date: 2009-02-02 18:17:35
Message-ID: 23028.1233598655@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Uh, I figure LIMIT NULL should return no rows.

It's worked the way it does now since 7.1, and no one has complained;
in fact we've gotten bug reports when it was broken by the int8-limit
patch. So there are people depending on the behavior.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-02-02 18:21:52 Re: parallel restore
Previous Message Zdenek Kotala 2009-02-02 18:16:59 Re: new buildfarm client code feature release