From: | Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_restore --no-policies should not restore policies' comment |
Date: | 2025-10-17 05:00:00 |
Message-ID: | 22ea3421-b92e-4ed5-a949-e3b03f61c432@gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Jian,
16.10.2025 17:22, jian he пишет:
>>> Buildfarm member petalura reported a failure at [1] after 0001 was backpatched
>>> to v13. However, the server logs show a "double free or corruption" error
>>> occurring as the backend was exiting. Since that code was not touched by 0001,
>>> for now I don't think this failure is related to the patch...
>>> But am I missing something?
>> After pushing 0004, petalura reported another failure with a "double
>> free or corruption" error:
>> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=petalura&dt=2025-09-18%2002%3A14%3A32
>>
>> Buildfarm member phycodurus also reported similar failures:
>> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=phycodurus&dt=2025-09-16%2011%3A09%3A07
>> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=phycodurus&dt=2025-09-16%2016%3A44%3A37
>>
>> I'll dig deeper into this issue.
>>
> It appears that this issue no longer exists, perhttps://bfbot.cputube.org
Unfortunately, buildfarm animals (especially phycodurus) are still
failing due to "double free or corruption (!prev)":
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=phycodurus&dt=2025-10-16%2019%3A07%3A52
I can try to reproduce this locally if it can be helpful.
Best regards,
Alexander
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2025-10-17 05:06:02 | Re: Extend documentation for pg_stat_replication.backend_xmin |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2025-10-17 04:31:42 | Re: Logical Replication of sequences |