Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Date: 2003-03-13 05:37:58
Message-ID: 2296.1047533878@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> It's upgrading the database that's likely to be the driving motivation
> for new sql or storage features. People usually don't get excited
> about upgrading the client libraries :)

Usually not. This cycle might be different though, if we are able to
finish the proposed improvements in error reporting and other issues
that are handicapping clients. None of that work will help un-upgraded
clients...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-03-13 06:06:21 Re: SQL99 ARRAY support proposal
Previous Message Joe Conway 2003-03-13 05:34:33 Re: [HACKERS] SQL99 ARRAY support proposal

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2003-03-13 06:29:19 Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Previous Message Barry Lind 2003-03-13 02:27:57 Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign