Re: Polymorphic types vs. domains

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Polymorphic types vs. domains
Date: 2008-12-08 13:04:41
Message-ID: 22954.1228741481@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> How would it break any apps?

Well, this would change the set of possible matches for ambiguous
function calls. So it's not out of the question that you could get
ambiguous-function failures that didn't happen before.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-12-08 13:14:19 Re: Multiplexing SUGUSR1
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-12-08 13:01:02 Re: ALTER composite type does not work, but ALTER TABLE which ROWTYPE is used as a type - works fine