Re: support fast default for domain with constraints

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: support fast default for domain with constraints
Date: 2025-03-05 03:13:40
Message-ID: 229413.1741144420@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Thanks to commit aaaf9449ec6be62cb0d30ed3588dc384f56274bf[1],
> ExprState.escontext (ErrorSaveContext) was added, and ExecEvalConstraintNotNull,
> ExecEvalConstraintCheck were changed to use errsave instead of hard error.
> Now we can use it to evaluate CoerceToDomain in a soft error way, that
> is what this patch intended to do.

This patch appears to summarily throw away a couple of
backwards-compatibility concerns that the previous round
took care to preserve:

* not throwing an error if the default would fail the domain
constraints, but the table is empty so there is no need to
instantiate the default.

* not assuming that the domain constraints are immutable.

Now it's fair to question how important the second point is
considering that we mostly treat domain constraints as immutable
elsewhere. But I think the first point has actual practical uses
--- for example, if you want to set things up so that inserts must
specify that column explicitly. So I don't think it's okay to
discard that behavior.

Maybe we need a regression test case demonstrating that that
behavior exists, to discourage people from breaking it ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-03-05 03:35:26 Monitoring gaps in XLogWalRcvWrite() for the WAL receiver
Previous Message jian he 2025-03-05 02:56:42 support fast default for domain with constraints