Re: Re: Call for platforms

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Call for platforms
Date: 2001-03-24 16:18:57
Message-ID: 22941.985450737@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
> =================================================
> 1 of 76 tests failed, 1 failed test(s) ignored.
> =================================================
>>
>> That's just ye olde random "random" failure ...

> Actually, this is one real failed test plus the "random" failure.

(Checks code...) Hm, you're right. May I suggest that this is a rather
confusing wording? Perhaps

1 of 76 tests failed, plus 1 failed test(s) ignored.

would be less likely to mislead people.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christian Marschalek 2001-03-24 17:30:06 Prefered programs and utils?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-03-24 15:08:03 Re: INHERITS behavor

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2001-03-24 16:28:24 Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-03-24 16:12:46 Re: AW: AW: Re: RELEASE STOPPER? nonportable int64 constant s in pg_crc.c