| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Sandeep Thakkar <sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) |
| Date: | 2018-08-24 18:38:28 |
| Message-ID: | 22941.1535135908@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2018-08-24 14:09:09 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> However, we only support VS2017 down to 9.6 and Vs2015 down to 9.5. Perhaps
>> we should consider backpatching support for those down to 9.3.
> Hm, I have no strong objections to that. I don't think it's strictly
> necessary, given 2013 is supported across the board, but for the non MSVC
> world, we do fix compiler issues in older branches. There's not that
> much code for the newer versions afaict?
+1 for taking a look at how big a patch it would be. But I kind of
thought we'd intentionally rejected back-patching some of those changes
to begin with, so I'm not sure the end decision will change.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-08-24 18:46:39 | Re: Accidental removal of a file causing various problems |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-08-24 18:36:59 | Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2018-08-24 19:10:02 | Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-08-24 18:36:59 | Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) |