| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Add support for temporary replication slots |
| Date: | 2016-12-12 19:32:57 |
| Message-ID: | 22907.1481571177@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Yes you are correct, we tried naively to first drop another slot in
> hopes that it will give the other backend enough time to close, but
> apparently that wasn't robust enough for slower machines.
> Attached is the fixed test using the loop from test_extensions (and yes
> I would have missed the pg_stat_clear_snapshot() call without the hint,
> thanks :) ).
Pushed, thanks.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-12-12 19:41:54 | pgsql: Catversion bump for temporary replication slots. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-12-12 19:32:27 | pgsql: Fix race condition in test_decoding "slot" test. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2016-12-12 19:42:54 | Re: Nested Wait Events? |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-12-12 19:30:02 | Re: tuplesort_gettuple_common() and *should_free argument |