From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "James B(dot) Byrne" <byrnejb(at)harte-lyne(dot)ca> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Problems with a custom LOCALE |
Date: | 2012-12-16 20:13:59 |
Message-ID: | 22871.1355688839@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
"James B. Byrne" <byrnejb(at)harte-lyne(dot)ca> writes:
>>> PG::Error: ERROR: encoding "UTF8" does not match locale
>>> "en_CA(at)yyyy-mmm-dd(dot)UTF-8"
>>> DETAIL: The chosen LC_CTYPE setting requires encoding "LATIN1".
> This is what I see on the host running postgresql-9.2
> # LC_ALL=en_CA(at)yyyy-mmm-dd(dot)utf8 locale charmap
> UTF-8
> Running locale against the base en_CA(at)yyyy-mmm-dd on the PG host shows
> this.
> LC_ALL=en_CA(at)yyyy-mmm-dd locale charmap
> ISO-8859-1
You're showing us three different spellings of the locale name above.
Are you really sure they're all equivalent?
Beyond that, you probably need to find a locale guru. I see no reason
to think there is anything wrong with the Postgres code for this, and
every reason to think there's something wrong with your locale
definition. But I don't know enough about custom locales to help you
identify exactly what.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Bex | 2012-12-16 21:09:29 | Re: Authenticate with hash instead of plaintext password? |
Previous Message | James B. Byrne | 2012-12-16 19:26:28 | Re: Problems with a custom LOCALE |