| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Subject: | Re: bytea vs. pg_dump |
| Date: | 2009-08-04 14:41:25 |
| Message-ID: | 22870.1249396885@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> If this seems reasonable, I can make a note of the point in the commit
>> message, so that we won't forget when the time comes.
> Or, what we could do is start an open items for 8.5 list similar to
> the one we made for 8.4. That worked pretty well, I think.
OK. Historically we haven't made such a list until beta starts, but
there's no reason we couldn't start it early.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2009-08-04 14:42:34 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Cause pg_proc.probin to be declared as text, not bytea. |
| Previous Message | Sam Mason | 2009-08-04 14:40:18 | Re: Review: Revise parallel pg_restore's scheduling heuristic |