| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>, Postgres JDBC <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] log_statement output for protocol |
| Date: | 2006-08-29 02:18:14 |
| Message-ID: | 22860.1156817894@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Yes, I do. I have applied the attached patch to fix this issue and
> several others. The fix was to save the bind parameters in the portal,
> and display those in the executor output, if available.
I have a feeling you just blew away the 4% savings in psql I've spent
the evening on. What's the overhead of this patch?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-29 02:22:33 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] log_statement output for protocol |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-29 02:09:51 | Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-29 02:22:33 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] log_statement output for protocol |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-29 02:08:33 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] log_statement output for protocol |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-29 02:22:33 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] log_statement output for protocol |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-29 02:09:51 | Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) |