Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> On Tue, 2026-10-06 at 16:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Concretely, about like this. (BTW, another argument for doing
>> this rather than fixing pg_dump is that there are a ton of other
>> applications that will likely misbehave if array_nulls is turned
>> on underneath them.)
> +1
> I have never seen this used in the field. One less potential headache!
Pushed, thanks for looking at it!
regards, tom lane