Klint Gore <kgore4(at)une(dot)edu(dot)au> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Maybe you've found a memory leak in pg_dump (it wouldn't be the first
>> one). Does this database have a particularly large number of objects?
> I wouldn't call it large - 27 tables, 111 functions, 21 custom types
> (used for set returning function results).
[ squint... ] Hard to see how that could be eating half a gig of
pg_dump memory space.
Would you be willing to send me a "pg_dump -s" (ie, just schema no
data) dump of this DB? Off-list of course.
regards, tom lane