Re: CREATE OR REPLACE AGGREGATE?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CREATE OR REPLACE AGGREGATE?
Date: 2019-03-17 14:22:50
Message-ID: 22790.1552832570@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 07:35:16AM +0000, Andrew Gierth wrote:
>> I took a bash at actually writing it and didn't see any obvious problems
>> (I'll post the patch in a bit). Is there some reason (other than
>> shortage of round tuits) why this might not be a good idea, or why it
>> hasn't been done before?

> Indeed.

Yeah, it seems like mostly a lack-of-round-tuits problem.

Updating the aggregate's dependencies correctly might be a bit tricky, but
it can't be any worse than the corresponding problem for functions...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Warner, Gary, Jr 2019-03-17 15:01:40 Re: Facing issue in using special characters
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2019-03-17 14:00:44 Re: jsonpath