Re: actualised funcs typmod patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: actualised funcs typmod patch
Date: 2009-11-17 18:54:08
Message-ID: 2278.1258484048@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 2009/11/17 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>> There are other issues but these are the ones I think we'd need to
>> resolve before not after putting in function typmods. It'd be
>> extremely painful and non-backwards-compatible to change our minds
>> later about function identity or coercion rules.

> I am sure, so this patch cannot break any current code.

My point is that if we release 8.5 with these semantics (which as far
as I can tell were not designed, but just fell out of what made for the
shortest patch) then we'll be stuck with them thereafter.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2009-11-17 19:20:47 Re: actualised funcs typmod patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-11-17 18:51:26 Re: UTF8 with BOM support in psql