Re: Perf Benchmarking and regression.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Perf Benchmarking and regression.
Date: 2016-06-03 17:42:09
Message-ID: 2273.1464975729@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> Note that other operating systems like windows and freebsd *alreaddy*
>> write back much more aggressively (independent of this change). I seem
>> to recall you yourself being quite passionately arguing that the linux
>> behaviour around this is broken.

> Sure, but being unhappy about the Linux behavior doesn't mean that I
> want our TPS on Linux to go down. Whether I like the behavior or not,
> we have to live with it.

Yeah. Bug or not, it's reality for lots of our users.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-06-03 17:43:14 Re: Perf Benchmarking and regression.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-06-03 17:41:57 Re: Tracking wait event for latches