Re: INSERT waiting under heavy load

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: alex-lists-pgsql(at)yuriev(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: INSERT waiting under heavy load
Date: 2006-01-06 20:52:08
Message-ID: 22727.1136580728@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

alex-lists-pgsql(at)yuriev(dot)com writes:
> After digging through all the discussions of "INSERT waiting" problems I am
> still not clear about the concensus about solving it.
> ...
> The only thing that I do not particulary like is that every INSERT
> into this table has to adjust a counter column in a corresponding row of the
> (table1) via (table3->table2->table1) path.

Well, if there are only a few rows in table1, then this design is
inherently going to lose big. Any two transactions trying to update the
same table1 row are going to conflict and one will have to wait for the
other to complete. Rethink the need for those counters.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-01-06 21:49:09 Re: INSERT waiting under heavy load
Previous Message alex-lists-pgsql 2006-01-06 20:16:57 Re: INSERT waiting under heavy load