Re: First-draft back-branch release notes are up

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: First-draft back-branch release notes are up
Date: 2025-05-04 03:55:37
Message-ID: 2263186.1746330937@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> we have two commits,
> https://git.postgresql.org/cgit/postgresql.git/commit/?id=d6dd2a02bae0d67ff6fbd73068dc36d0b82fc14b
> and
> https://git.postgresql.org/cgit/postgresql.git/commit/?id=bd178960c69bae972c274af8102da9018df8196a

> we should include both commit's authors...

Argh --- yes, I missed you in crediting that one. My apologies,
will fix tomorrow.

> BTW, I found that for minor releases, bug reporter is not included....

No, we generally haven't done that in release notes, only in the
commit log. I think the only cases where we credit reporters in
the release notes are CVE-worthy security bugs.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2025-05-04 05:02:51 Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations
Previous Message jian he 2025-05-04 03:20:42 Re: First-draft back-branch release notes are up