Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)googlemail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints
Date: 2009-07-20 17:00:12
Message-ID: 22630.1248109212@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
>> Please, no. Constraints are not a datatype. Do not copy the brain-dead
>> decision that put ri_triggers there.

> Does that mean ri_triggers should come out of there?

Not as long as we're on CVS --- it isn't worth the loss of history.
I might think about it when/if we move to git.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-07-20 17:16:49 Re: [PATCH] SE-PgSQL/tiny rev.2193
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-07-20 16:45:47 Re: [PATCH v4] Avoid manual shift-and-test logic in AllocSetFreeIndex