Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bryan Green <dbryan(dot)green(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)
Date: 2025-12-15 20:39:17
Message-ID: 2259481.1765831157@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Experimenting here, it looks like 'C.UTF-8' might be accepted
> everywhere. I even got it to pass on Solaris's not-GNU gettext,
> which I thought for sure would be the weak spot in the idea.
> I'll press forward with that.

Hmmm ... the first batch of BF reports show that on some Linux
machines, it works to set lc_messages to 'C.UTF-8', but nonetheless
no translation happens. Did you notice any other gating factors?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nazir Bilal Yavuz 2025-12-15 21:01:19 Re: [PATCH] Fix severe performance regression with gettext 0.20+ on Windows
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2025-12-15 20:28:42 Re: Proposal: Add a callback data parameter to GetNamedDSMSegment