Re: Why facebook used mysql ?

From: Andy <angelflow(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, DaveGauthier <dave(dot)gauthier(at)intel(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Why facebook used mysql ?
Date: 2010-11-09 17:01:46
Message-ID: 225795.76753.qm@web111307.mail.gq1.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


--- On Tue, 11/9/10, Gauthier, Dave <dave(dot)gauthier(at)intel(dot)com> wrote:

> A different slant on this has to do with licensing and $$.
> Might Oracle decide some day to start charging for their new
> found DB?  They are a for-profit company that's
> beholding to their shareholders LONG before an open software
> community.  Consumers like Facebook and Google have
> deep pockets, something corporate executives really don't
> dismiss lightly.

This is just FUD.

MySQL is GPL'd, just like Linux is.

To say you should avoid MySQL because Oracle may someday start charging for it is like saying you should avoid Linux because Red Hat may someday start charging for it.

That makes no sense, especially since both Oracle and Red Hat are already charging for their products. Doesn't mean you can't keep using free Linux and MySQL.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2010-11-09 17:11:47 Re: finding the other statement causing a sharelock
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2010-11-09 17:00:13 Re: Why facebook used mysql ?