Re: checking on buildfarm member thrush

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: checking on buildfarm member thrush
Date: 2006-06-22 13:45:22
Message-ID: 22569.1150983922@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm trying to determine why thrush has been failing on PG CVS HEAD for
>> the past few days. Could you try running the attached program on that
>> machine, and see what it prints? I suspect it will dump core :-(

> $ gcc -D_GNU_SOURCE tom.c -o tom
> $ ./tom
> failed: Success

Hmph. Well, that destroys the posix_fadvise-dumps-core theory, and
leaves us still wondering why thrush is failing "make check".
There's been a core dump recently introduced *somewhere*:

NOTICE: type reference hobbies_r.person%TYPE converted to text
LOG: server process (PID 2818) was terminated by signal 11
LOG: terminating any other active server processes

Could you get a gdb stack trace from that crash? If the buildfarm
run is under a suitable ulimit, it should be leaving a core file
in the test PGDATA directory.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-06-22 13:52:24 Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted on Windows?)
Previous Message Dave Page 2006-06-22 13:39:54 Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe