Re: Use of index in 7.0 vs 6.5

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: "Ryan Bradetich" <ryan_bradetich(at)hp(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Use of index in 7.0 vs 6.5
Date: 2000-05-25 14:39:09
Message-ID: 22559.959265549@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

"Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>> One way to put a thumb on the scales is to reduce the value of the SET
>> variable random_page_cost. The default value is 4.0, which seems to
>> correspond more or less to reality, but reducing it to 3 or so would
>> shift the planner pretty nicely in the direction of indexscans.

> Or how about changing current fudge factor ?
> For example,from 0.5 to 0.2 which is the fudge factor of attdisbursion
> calculation.

Yes, that's another way --- and probably more defensible than changing
random_page_cost, now that I think about it. Unfortunately it's a
hardwired constant and so not as easily experimented with :-(.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-25 15:11:23 Re: Use of index in 7.0 vs 6.5
Previous Message Mikheev, Vadim 2000-05-25 14:29:58 RE: Use of index in 7.0 vs 6.5