| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christof Petig <christof(dot)petig(at)wtal(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transaction is still open |
| Date: | 2000-10-11 14:03:00 |
| Message-ID: | 22555.971272980@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Christof Petig <christof(dot)petig(at)wtal(dot)de> writes:
> I would even propose 'idle (transaction open)' if you agree. (Seemed too
> long for me)
No, the ps strings have got to be *short*. A lot of platforms have a
tight limit on how much command string ps will show. I thought 'trans'
was OK, though perhaps someone has an even better idea?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-10-11 14:54:17 | Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transaction is still open |
| Previous Message | Adam Lang | 2000-10-11 13:37:52 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-10-11 14:54:17 | Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transaction is still open |
| Previous Message | Christof Petig | 2000-10-11 06:54:29 | Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transaction is still open |