Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transaction is still open

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Christof Petig <christof(dot)petig(at)wtal(dot)de>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transaction is still open
Date: 2000-10-11 15:14:56
Message-ID: 200010111514.LAA09485@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> Christof Petig <christof(dot)petig(at)wtal(dot)de> writes:
> > I would even propose 'idle (transaction open)' if you agree. (Seemed too
> > long for me)
>
> No, the ps strings have got to be *short*. A lot of platforms have a
> tight limit on how much command string ps will show. I thought 'trans'
> was OK, though perhaps someone has an even better idea?

idle/trans?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2000-10-11 15:14:58 Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transaction is still open
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2000-10-11 15:04:37 Trigger question

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Philip Warner 2000-10-11 15:14:58 Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transaction is still open
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-10-11 14:54:17 Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transaction is still open