| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Kohei Kaigai <kohei(dot)kaigai(at)emea(dot)nec(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Common object property boards |
| Date: | 2011-08-07 16:02:34 |
| Message-ID: | 22555.1312732954@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> writes:
> I'm under implementation of this code according to the suggestion.
> However, I'm not sure whether it is really portable way (at least, GCC accepts),
> and whether the interface is simpler than as Robert suggested at first.
> #define get_object_property_attnum_name(objtype) \
> ({ AttrNumber ____temp; \
> get_object_property((objtype), NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, \
> &____temp, NULL, NULL); \
> ____temp; })
Blocks within expressions are a gcc-ism and will fail on any other
compiler, so you can't do it that way.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-08-07 17:47:49 | Yes, WaitLatch is vulnerable to weak-memory-ordering bugs |
| Previous Message | Wojciech Muła | 2011-08-07 12:57:36 | [PL/pgSQL] %TYPE and array declaration |