Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Date: 2023-06-06 19:55:45
Message-ID: 225170.1686081345@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 3:25 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Also +1, except that I find "none" a rather confusing choice of name.
>> There *is* a provider, it's just PG itself not either libc or ICU.
>> I thought Joe's suggestion of "internal" made more sense.

> Or perhaps "builtin" or "postgresql".

Either OK by me

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2023-06-06 19:56:32 Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2023-06-06 19:53:00 Re: could not extend file "base/5/3501" with FileFallocate(): Interrupted system call